Climate change is a hot topic these days. Ever since COVID I am never sure of the information I read and hear. Fact checking is a thing of the past. I am sure I am not alone on some of this thinking. I disagree with fear reporting.
On March 21, 2025, the Science of Climate change journal published a ground-breaking study. The peer-reined study and literature review not only reassesses man’s role in climate change narrative, it also reveals a general trend to exaggerate global warming.
The study was completed using AI, Grok-3 that reviewed all of the scientific data. This is not the only area where AI is meeting science review. Government funded research and the prediction of using AI for Western Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Centre for Disease Control, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, all are rapidly developing AI solutions.
So, what were the findings of climate change? Finds no lasting human C02 signature in the atmosphere over centuries. Temperature drives C02 levels, not C02 drives temperature. The sun takes centre stage in the thoughts on global warming. What the paper does not address is the damage done to the earth and to the people of this earth in the name of climate change. Using expensive “green energy” has made it harder for billions of people to escape poverty. Green Colonialism is now the term being used.
Farmers are being driven out of business across Europe, Ireland, and the United Kingdom by the policies and agendas. Farmers are being driven out of business leading to higher food prices and variability. In addition, farmers have been pressured to cease breading cattle and other livestock to eliminate methane emissions from the planet. All of this is being conducted in the name of “man-made” climate change. Where is all this leading to for us. Not sure but I think we can’t overthink things. We can’t operate in fear but move forward.
‘The problem as well is that there is no one solution that fits everyone. I agree that the environment needs to be protected. However, are the policies a success or a abysmal failure? Where does human health fit into all of these policies? Are all of these concerns an attempt to make us fearful? The best policy is to review the source of the information, reputation, and to determine if this is fear reporting. Thank you to AI for unbiased reporting.
Make an appointment to talk health and worry, info@mindhealthconnect.ca
Ref: science of climatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/SCC-Grok-3-Review-V5-1.